President Murmu rejects mercy petition of Red Fortress attack LeT convict Mohammed Arif

Story highlights

President Droupadi Murmu has rejected the mercy petition of Pakistani terrorist Mohammed Arif alias Ashfaq convicted on December 12, 2000, within the Red Fortress attack by which three jawans of Rajputana Rifles had been killed, officials said.

The President took the decisive transfer on Might perchance well 27. She idea to be the mercy plea of the Pakistani national Arif, who used to be came right by means of guilty of orchestrating the attack and the Supreme Court docket on November 2, 2022 affirmed the demise penalty awarded to the Lakshar-e-Taiba terrorist for the December 12, 2000, Red Fortress Attack case. The attack resulted within the demise of three folks including two military officers.

Here is the second time the President has denied a mercy petition since taking living of enterprise on July 25, 2022.
The precious points of that fateful day remain etched within the minds of many. The tranquil and historic Red Fortress, an emblem of India’s heritage, used to be shattered by gunfire and chaos. The attack left a path of devastation, claiming lives and wounding many. Within the aftermath, Mohammed Arif used to be captured and dropped at trial, where he used to be convicted of the harmful crime.

On the night of December 22, 2000, some intruders entered the Mughal-generation castle where unit 7 of Rajputana Rifles of the Indian Military used to be stationed and opened fire at them. Three Military jawans had been killed within the attack.

The intruders later escaped by scaling the rear aspect boundary of the castle.

Over time, Arif’s case has effort its attain by means of the labyrinth of the merely diagram. Appeals and opinions stretched the draw, but by some means, the ideal courts upheld his conviction. In a remaining say to protect a long way from his sentence, Arif filed a mercy petition, hoping for a reprieve from the President of India.

However, President Droupadi Murmu, after careful consideration and overview of the gravity of the crime, rejected Arif’s plea for mercy. This likelihood marks the tip of a protracted and arduous merely trudge, reaffirming the stance towards terrorism and turning in a measure of closure to those suffering from the attack. The rejection of the mercy petition underscores a commitment to justice and the rule of rules, sending a favorable message that acts of fear will be met with the corpulent drive of merely .

Arif used to be convicted of the attack and sentenced to demise on October 31, 2005, by a trial courtroom. This used to be confirmed by the Delhi High Court docket in September 2007 and by the Supreme Court docket in August 2011. He then filed a overview petition, which used to be rejected by a bench of two judges. The tip courtroom also brushed off his healing petition tough the rejection of the overview petition. The convict then filed a contemporary writ petition praying that his overview petitions would possibly possibly soundless had been heard by a bench of three judges and in begin courtroom.

Listening to this, a Constitution bench decided in September 2014 that every person demise sentence cases will be heard by a 3-judge bench in begin courtroom. Accordingly, his overview petition used to be heard again by a 3-judge bench. The overview plea challenged the trial courtroom’s reliance on call data records as proof. On November 2, 2022, the Supreme Court docket bench then affirmed the demise sentence awarded to the terrorist.