College of Minnesota researchers are discovering that prior publicity to conflicting health info reduces receptivity to messages about broadly-steered health behaviors.
This day’s public info ambiance is characterised by conflicting info about a huge vary of health matters, at the side of nutrition, cancer screening, e-cigarettes, and most lately, COVID-19. Study has shown publicity to conflicting info can negatively accept as true with an affect on public working out and belief in health strategies.
What is never any longer identified is whether such publicity may well manufacture of us much less receptive to other health messages, at the side of these about broadly steered health behaviors for which there is tiny battle, comparable to fruit and vegetable consumption and bodily exercise. The doable for such “carryover effects” from publicity to conflicting info was as soon as lately examined by an interdisciplinary team of College of Minnesota researchers.
Published within the journal Annals of Behavioral Medication, the U of M watch eager a 3-wave, online gaze experiment with a representative sample of just about 3,000 U.S. adults in some unspecified time in the future of the summer season of 2020. Participants had been randomly assigned to ogle a chain of health news stories and social media posts about six a range of health matters at the side of mammography screening and carbohydrate consumption. These stories and posts, which had been shown to participants twice over a month-prolonged length, differed handiest in whether they featured battle over scientific proof or steerage. As a minimal one week after their 2nd viewing, participants had been requested to overview ads from several novel health campaigns about behaviors for which there is broad scientific consensus: Fruit and vegetable consumption, bodily exercise, and colorectal cancer screening.
Results confirmed that prior publicity to conflicting health info rendered of us much less receptive to messages about these broadly steered health behaviors.
Folks that had been previously exposed to battle reported better resistance to the health campaign ads, in addition to decrease perceptions of the health behaviors featured in these ads.
Statistical evaluation indicated that carryover effects largely operated thru of us’s feelings of backlash in direction of health strategies and overview in customary, which was as soon as elicited by their prior publicity to battle.
“These outcomes are worrisome, particularly given a COVID-19 info landscape that is increasingly fraught with apparently conflicting science, as our team’s past overview has shown,” mentioned Rebekah Nagler, watch lead and an affiliate professor within the Hubbard College of Journalism and Mass Verbal change, and a Masonic Cancer Center member. “In a roundabout diagram, of us’s cumulative, routine publicity to conflicting info about COVID-19 and other health points may well well threaten the success of media campaigns and other public health messaging strategies—strategies that we as a nation make investments in heavily twelve months after twelve months to stay cancer and other continual ailments.”
Nagler and her colleagues are unquestionably smitten by pointers on how to intervene and interrupt the carryover phenomenon and better communicate with the public about evolving science.
Prior publicity to conflicting health info reduces receptivity to steered health habits messages, watch says (2021, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2021
This doc is enviornment to copyright. Other than any stunning dealing for the motive of non-public watch or overview, no
part may well well honest be reproduced without the written permission. The snort material is equipped for info functions handiest.