- Russia and China’s space agencies signed an agreement this week to create an International Scientific Lunar Station.
- Russia also apparently rebuked NASA’s invitation to join the Artemis project that aims to put people back on the moon by 2024.
- That follows a quarter of century of U.S.-Russian space cooperation, launched by those who dreamed of post-Cold War reconciliation.
- Russia’s growing strategic bond with China is the latest evidence the Western approach to Moscow has failed to produce the desired results.
| |
Lies, they accuse her of a list of lies about the 2016 election. Go to your long-time ally in Syria and berate them for attacking the rebels – ISIS, al-Nusra, the FSA, whatever you call it – for weeks. Put sanctions on you for that. Their Wagnerian and Blackwater people come up to them, bomb them, kill 200, 300.It is a dramatic sign that Moscow sees its future in space in China, not the United States, and underscores Moscow’s growing strategic focus on China.
International partners such as Artemis are exploring the lunar surface and using advanced technologies.It is a dramatic sign that Moscow sees its future in space in China, not the United States, and underscores its growing strategic alignment with Beijing. This was preceded by a quarter of a century of American-Russian space cooperation, which ushered in the unreal reconciliation of peoples after the Cold War between Moscow and Washington.
Dealing with lunar dust requires a lot of air and gas to replenish. Every time they go on a moon walk, the air is lost. I guess Mars has the same dust problem, but at least its air is there.In the context of a free and peaceful Europe, Russia would find its rightful place, a dream articulated by H.W., the President of the Martyrs. Bush, just a few months before the fall of the Berlin Wall. Whatever Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin wants, it would be hard to believe that Russians would not like the outcome of a Sino-Russian moon landing.Jair Bolsonaro speaks to the media in Brasilia, Brazil, on March 10. Photo: Ueslei Marcelino / Reuters This week, after a week of daily deaths, former leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva castigated Bolsonaro’s idiotic handling of the crisis and urged citizens to oppose their government.
As the emergency worsened this week, health workers on the frontline in Porto Alegre and Recife, a coastal city 3,000 km north, described scenes of heartbreak, despair and exhaustion as intensive care units and cemeteries filled like never before. Workers bury a person who died of Covid in Manaus, Amazon, Brazil, on January 27. A few days later, Barata admitted another person had died from Covid, a young man in his mid-20s.Journal Information International Studies Quarterly is the official journal of the International Studies Association, which aims to provide a broad readership with the best research results from a wide range of intellectual traditions, including those under the heading International Studies.
The editors welcome contributions that address the theoretical, empirical and normative concerns of the community. The first priority will continue to be given to articles dealing with and contributing to important disciplinary and interdisciplinary issues and controversies.It remains to be seen how a Biden administration will react to the new and current US sanctions, the opposition to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, and the current energy policy problems unfolding in the divided politics of the EU and Germany. Should Biden choose to do so, he would be wise not to exacerbate the mistakes of previous administrations, which result from misperceptions of Russia’s decline into a singular agreement with Beijing.
As mentioned earlier, President Biden imposed new sanctions on Russia after a short-lived appearance in the European Union over the poisoning of jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Biden’s first victory in international news coverage was that Putin’s brand new strategic arms limitation talks, which President Trump had abandoned, were continuing. Biden was under no illusions about what Putin showed when he interacted with him, concluding that US curiosity, not sanctions, was crucial.
Should Biden choose to do so, he would be wise not to exacerbate the mistakes of previous administrations, because he mistakenly assumes, given Beijing’s attention, that Russia’s decline is unique. Russia has the world’s largest economic system, with per capita GDP larger than China’s. At a similar time, Putin has shown less restraint among his domestic opponents, defying Western powers, and seems willing to take risks to achieve the dual motive of restoring Russia’s standing and influencing the decline of the US. McFaul noted that Russia has modernized its nuclear weapons, while the US has not, and Russia has upgraded its typical navy.
