Reported By: | Edited By: DNA Web Desk |Source: PTI & DNA |Updated: Feb 21, 2022, 11: 58 PM IST
The Uttarakhand Excessive Court docket on Monday sought the dispute authorities’s stand on the Haridwar Dharma Sansad case provocative alleged inflammatory speeches made against Muslims.
Hearing the bail plea of Jitendra Narayan Tyagi alias Wasim Rizvi, Justice R C Khulbe requested the dispute authorities to elaborate its stand on the problem sooner than February 23, the following date of listening to of the bail plea.
The case against Rizvi and others had been lodged on the criticism of Nadeem Ali, a resident of Jwalapur Haridwar at Haridwar Kotwali on January 2, 2022.
He had alleged in his criticism that Dharma Sansad/Non secular Parliament modified into once organised in Haridwar by Hindu sages from December 17 to 19 and in the garb of this tournament, the contributors were instigated to wage a warfare against Muslims.
Objectionable phrases were feeble against the holy Quran and Prophet Mohammad, Ali had mentioned in his criticism, adding these bright statements had later long previous viral on social media.
These movies were circulated by Wasim Rizvi alias Jitendra Narayan Tyagi, Yati Narsinghanand and others, he had alleged.
The FIR also alleged that an strive modified into once made by Prabodhanand Giri to spread violence against the oldsters residing in Haridwar’s mosques.
On Nadeem Ali’s criticism, Narsindhanand Giri, Sagar Sindhu Maharaj, Dharamdas Maharaj, Parmanand Maharaj, Sadhvi Annapurna, Swami Anand Swaroop, Aswani Upadhyay, Suresh Chavan along with Swami Prabodhanand Giri, Jitendra Narayan were booked below Sections 153A, 295 and different relevant sections of the IPC for allegedly handing over abominate speeches in the name of religion at the conclave.
