Reported By: | Edited By: DNA Web Crew |Supply: PTI |As a lot as this point: Mar 01, 2022, 07: 24 PM IST
A case has been registered in opposition to the administrator of a Facebook online page ‘Mangalore Muslims’ and one more one who had posted in opposition to one in every of the three judges of the Karnataka High Court docket hearing the hijab case. The cyber crime division of the Bengaluru South division registered a case by itself in opposition to Ateeq Shariff from Bengaluru and the administrator of ‘Mangalore Muslims’ on February 23, which came to gentle goal lately.
The criticism says that Ateeq Shariff posted derogatory insist on February 12 in opposition to one in every of the judges questioning his credentials and integrity. Of us that had cherished the put up in opposition to the mediate could well well furthermore simply furthermore incur the penal circulate, a police officer mentioned. This incident comes shut on the heels of derogatory remarks in opposition to the identical mediate by Kannada actor Chetan Kumar Ahimsa who became arrested and remanded to judicial custody.
The three-mediate bench particularly constituted to hear the hijab case comprises Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice J M Khazi and Justice Krishna S Dixit. The bench became fashioned after some Muslim ladies from the coastal district of Udupi, approached the court docket declaring that they had been denied entry to the faculty for sporting hijab.
The ladies furthermore wished a authorities disclose banning any materials that would disturb peace, harmony and public expose heart’s contents to be quashed. The authorities disclose came following tension on the campuses of tutorial establishments in varied parts of Karnataka because it modified into out to be hijab versus saffron scarves, thus leading to communal tension. The HC has heard the case and an disclose is pending.
READ | Ilker Ayci is doubtlessly no longer recent CEO of Air India, declines Tata Workforce’s provide
