The CEO of HR software solutions vendor HRLocker, Adam Coleman, suggests that businesses replace the yearly performance review procedure with frequent feedback.
It’s a challenging time for workers. Every dollar is in demand as inflation soars and earnings remain stagnant. The likelihood of layoffs is high, and employees are concerned they may be included in the upcoming round. They are not interested in sitting down to conduct a drawn-out annual performance assessment. Let’s be real here. Who is to blame for them?
The customary annual evaluation is one of the most dated and despised institutional practises. Even while it has been practised since the time of ancient China, the industrial revolution is when it really started to take off. Performance reviews were firmly established in the HR function and other organisational processes in the early 1900s as a result of American obsession with ability testing and quotients. The military’s predominantly merit-based ranking system continues to have an impact on the procedures many organisations use today. The globe has, nevertheless, undergone a great deal of change.
Humans have conquered the moon, developed autonomous cars, established the internet, and given robots jobs. It’s also a completely distinct realm of labour. Workplaces change constantly. They are mobile, adaptable, remote, and even nomadic. Practises and priorities are constantly shifting. It is almost unnecessary to examine employees on an annual basis.
If your company continues to use the yearly performance review procedure, consider if it is still effective. Does it enable you and your team to pursue your business objectives? In these difficult circumstances, does it increase your production and competitiveness? Or perhaps you simply haven’t had the time to fix a malfunctioning system.
The issue with yearly reviews
In principle, annual performance evaluations are a great concept. They allow managers to evaluate the contributions that employees make to the company and offer useful criticism to boost output.
They should provide you a designated period of time to sit down with your employees, inquire about their jobs, roles, and experiences, and then give you the chance to offer helpful criticism and recognise their best achievements. It appears to be a wise investment, don’t you think?
What takes place during a performance review isn’t always the issue. Friction is being caused by the manner, reason, and timing of these appraisals. To begin with, once a year is insufficient.
Employees wouldn’t receive a single performance evaluation if the yearly performance review were used in the start-up industry, as the majority of businesses fail within a year. Teams are also rapidly evolving as more companies use contract and independent workers during hard times. Due to the collaboration and cross-pollination within traditional business areas, organisations are becoming more project-oriented. What would happen in these situations if you waited a full year to provide career guidance and obtain formal feedback?
Table of Contents
Today’s workplace is much more dynamic; new technology frequently drives the development of new procedures and systems, and regular software updates need changes to the way things actually work. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that over a third of employees seek regular feedback from their manager.
In conclusion, a review system is a need. It fosters accountability and serves as a motivating reminder of our progress. But the format as it is now has to alter.
A ‘no-brainer’ is continuous feedback
Gallup data shows that team members are more than twice as likely to be engaged at work when supervisors offer weekly feedback. So, it makes sense to review more often.
The annual review doesn’t have to be repeated every week or month; it wouldn’t be the best use of your time or that of your staff.
Instead, concentrate on developing processes that enable continuous feedback, whether that means include a feedback stage in your projects, designating time in your monthly meetings to discuss progress, or developing some other approach that works for you.
This feedback ought to be tailored to each person’s objectives and projects so that your team may work in iterations and make minor adjustments frequently.
Better questions to ask
It’s also time to scrutinise the information included in performance reviews. Every firm should take advantage of this time to address the issues that are most important to both its customers and their bottom line. Are your staff at risk of burnout, for instance? Do they have enough free time to spend with friends and family without work getting in the way? Are they in good physical and mental health? Do they find fulfilment in their jobs?
Use the time in your performance assessments to focus on work environment and style as remote work becomes more prevalent. We may all gain from a deeper understanding of the working patterns of our coworkers, whether we are part of a full-time office team, a hybrid gang, or a dispersed team of digital nomads.
Make the review significant.
The most crucial thing to ascertain is whether your setup is conducive to the success of both your organisation and your staff. If it’s not, make sure to offer your colleagues an alternative method of working if you have the authority to change the situation.
If you can’t give your employees extra money to weather the cost-of-living storm, at least consider measures to improve the quality of their workday. Even if it isn’t a full-fledged remote-work policy, a core-hours policy demonstrates consideration for the distinctive lifestyles of your employees.
Regular check-ins also offer the chance to modify workflows. Workers want the ability to use tech-powered tools and solutions, according to our most recent poll. One in three people think that businesses should invest in AI to, for instance, automate laborious work.
Your workforce may concentrate on more meaningful work if you equip them to use new tools and provide meaningful employment options through technology. However, if you don’t probe them or give them a chance to express their desires, you won’t be aware of this.
Your performance assessments can develop into much more than a simple check-the-box activity if you have a regular feedback loop in place. They can develop into an opportunity to discuss the things that motivate your staff, the company’s future and their place in it, as well as all the things they can anticipate in the coming year.
They might even be the key to retaining talent, staying competitive and achieving critical business objectives. Who wouldn’t want that?
